Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- text:nausiphanes_of_teos_fragments [2013/08/13 18:36] – created fredmond
+++ text:nausiphanes_of_teos_fragments [2014/01/15 11:58] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-Ancilla to the Pre-Socratic Philosophers, by Kathleen Freeman, [1948]
+Ancilla to the Pre-Socratic Philosophers. A complete translation of the Fragments in Diels, Fragmente der Vorsokratiker by Kathleen Freeman. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press [1948] This text is in the public domain in the US because its copyright was not renewed in a timely fashion as required by law at the time. The chapters are numbered as in the Fifth Edition of Diels, Fragmente der Vorsokratiker. The numbers in brackets are those of the Fourth Edition.
-====== 72. ANAXARCHUS OF ABDÊRA ======
+====== Nausiphanes of Teos: Fragments ======
+Nausiphanes of Teos lived in the time of Alexander, and after.
-Anaxarchus of Abdêra was in his prime about 340 B.C., and was active throughout the reign of Alexander.
+He wrote a book called The Tripod, on epistemology and method. This was said to have been the source of Epicurus’ Canon. It is preserved in epitome only, by Philodemus.
-He wrote a book On Monarchy.
+. (The man of science has the capacity for rhetoric, even if he does not practise it).
-. Much learning can help much, but also can greatly harm him who has it. It helps the clever man, but harms him who readily utters every word in any company. One must know the measure of the right time, for this is the boundary of wisdom. Those who recite a saying outside the right time, even if their saying is wise, are reproached with folly, because they do not mix intelligence with wisdom.
+. (The wise man will pursue rhetoric, because honour depends on winning a reputation for cleverness in politics, rather than on the over-lauded virtues.
-. (From the work 'On Monarchy'): It is hard to collect money, but harder still to keep it safely.
+The wise man is he who can persuade his hearers; this power belongs to the man of science, its source being his knowledge of the facts, so that he could pass on his own convictions not only to his pupils but to any race of people. Having a knowledge of the facts, he is able to lead his audience where he wishes, because he can tell them what is to their advantage, which is what they wish to hear. The scientist has command of the best diction also: not that created by vain imagination and usage, but that based on the nature of things. He also has command of logic, without which knowledge is impossible, and is best qualified in that art indispensable to a statesman in a democracy or monarchy or any other constitution, of calculation of the future from the known facts.
+The man who employs continuous discourse will be best able to employ the dialectic method and vice versa, because both depend on an accurate judgement of how to lead pupils from the known to the unknown; that is, they depend upon a knowledge of the 'right time' and 'right measure' in speaking).
+. (Nausiphanes gave 'immovability' as the goal of life, this being the name he gave to Democritus’ 'imperturbability').
+. (Of those things which appear to exist, nothing exists more than it does not exist).